MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964339032 · doi:10.1002/ctpp.201700202

Theory of complex fluids in the warm dense matter regime and application to an unusual phase transition in liquid carbon

2018· article· en· W2964339032 on OpenAlexaff
M. W. C. Dharma‐wardana

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Plasma Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWarm dense matterMaterials scienceIonIonizationPhase (matter)Ionic bondingMolecular dynamicsAtom (system on chip)Atomic physicsElectronScatteringMolecular physicsThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data from recent laser‐shock experiments or from simulations using density functional theory (DFT), molecular dynamics (MD), path integrals etc. that are available for warm dense carbon are compared with the corresponding results predicted using the neutral pseudo‐atom [NPA] method. The NPA results are in good agreement not only with the 3–12 g/cm 3 regimes that have been studied via path‐integral Monte Carlo methods but even at low densities and low temperatures where transient covalent bonding dominates ionic correlations. Thus, the “prepeak” due to the C–C bond at ∼1.4 Å and other features found in the pair distribution function g [ r ] from DFT + MD simulations at 0.86 eV and 3.7 g/cm 3 and other densities etc. are recovered accurately in the NPA + HNC (hypernetted‐chain) calculations. The exploration of regimes not covered by previous studies is presented together with evidence of an unusual phase transition of carbon in the liquid state to a vapour, as seen from the loss of ion–ion correlations. An abrupt decrease in the number of free electrons per ion occurs simultaneously. A metallic liquid with strong ionic correlations arising from transient C–C bonds becomes a metallic vapour. This occurs when carbon at the density of ∼1.0 g/cm 3 and mean ionization Z = 4 transits abruptly to a disordered mono‐atomic vapour at 7 eV, with Z ≃ 3. The behaviour of the pressure, compressibility and the electrical conductivity as well as physical quantities available from X‐ray Thomson scattering are presented across the tentatively proposed phase transition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to Plasma PhysicsSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207