An open-label, multicenter, expanded access study assessing the safety and efficacy of oral ruxolitinib administered to patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia myelofibrosis (PPV MF) or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (PET-MF).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TPS6640 Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) can be primary in origin or can progress from polycythemia vera (PPV-MF) or essential thrombocythemia (PET-MF). MF is characterized by cytopenias, reactive bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms including weight loss, fever, and night sweats. MF is associated with dysregulation of the Janus kinase pathway, irrespective of JAK2V617F mutation status. Recently, ruxolitinib (INCB018424) was approved for the treatment of MF on the basis of results from 2 phase 3 trials (COMFORT-I and -II). These trials demonstrated marked reductions in splenomegaly and symptom burden, and improvements in health-related quality of life (QoL) measures. Methods: JAK Inhibitor rUxolitinib in Myelofibrosis Patients (JUMP) is a global, phase 3b expanded access trial (NCT01493414) designed to assess the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in adult pts with PMF, PPV-MF or PET-MF who are treatment naïve, and are intolerant of, or had progressed on any prior therapy. Inclusion criteria: peripheral blast count of <10%, adequate liver and renal function and intermediate-2 or high risk MF according to IPSS criteria or intermediate-1 risk MF with palpable spleen length ≥ 5 cm. The primary endpoint is to assess the safety of ruxolitinib. Additional endpoints include the proportion of pts with a > 50% reduction in palpable spleen length, % change in white blood cell and platelet counts from baseline (BL), and change in packed red blood cell transfusion requirements. Changes from BL in QoL scores will be assessed using validated ECOG PS, FACT-Lymphoma, and FACIT instruments. Pts with a BL platelet count > 200,000/μL will receive oral ruxolitinib 20 mg BID; pts with a BL platelet count of 100,000/μL to 200,000/μL will receive 15 mg BID; dose modifications are permitted for safety and efficacy. Global enrollment is open and currently includes 277 pts. This is planned to be the largest study ever conducted in pts with MF. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".