Convolutional Neural Networks for Spectroscopic Analysis in Retinal Oximetry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Retinal oximetry is a non-invasive technique to investigate the hemodynamics, vasculature and health of the eye. Current techniques for retinal oximetry have been plagued by quantitatively inconsistent measurements and this has greatly limited their adoption in clinical environments. To become clinically relevant oximetry measurements must become reliable and reproducible across studies and locations. To this end, we have developed a convolutional neural network algorithm for multi-wavelength oximetry, showing a greatly improved calculation performance in comparison to previously reported techniques. The algorithm is calibration free, performs sensing of the four main hemoglobin conformations with no prior knowledge of their characteristic absorption spectra and, due to the convolution-based calculation, is invariable to spectral shifting. We show, herein, the dramatic performance improvements in using this algorithm to deduce effective oxygenation (SO 2 ), as well as the added functionality to accurately measure fractional oxygenation ( $${{\bf{SO}}}_{{\bf{2}}}^{{\boldsymbol{f}}{\boldsymbol{r}}}$$ SO 2 f r ). Furthermore, this report compares, for the first time, the relative performance of several previously reported multi-wavelength oximetry algorithms in the face of controlled spectral variations. The improved ability of the algorithm to accurately and independently measure hemoglobin concentrations offers a high potential tool for disease diagnosis and monitoring when applied to retinal spectroscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".