MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964436066 · doi:10.3138/mous.16.1-05

More Astronomy in Ovid’s Daedalus and Icarus

2019· article· en· W2964436066 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Architectural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsICARUSArtPhysicsAstronomyArt historyAstrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay presents a cosmographic analysis of Ovid’s mythology in both Ars am. 2.21–96 and Met. 8.174–235. Daedalus’ flying instruction me duce carpe viam! at 8.208 = Ars am. 2.57–58 appears to deal with the in-tandem Morning Rising of Daedalus alias the single star Protrygeter/Vindemitor and Icarus alias the single star Arcturus, which heralds the grape harvest in September. Icarus is not supposed to impersonate his namesake Icarus pater Erigones, the pioneer winegrower from Attica who was catasterized into the constellation Boötes. Nevertheless the aviator imitates the winegrower’s Evening Setting = Boötes’ συγκατάδυσις (with συν-= “together with the Sun/ vicino sole/ Deo propiore” at Ars am. 2.59–60 and 85), thus causing the wax to liquescere/molliri/φάεος κορέσασθαι at Met. 8.225–226 in the season when ἠελίοιο κατερχομένοιο δύηται <Βοώτης> (Aratus, Phaen. 582–585).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it