MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964451451

Canadá hoy: política, sociedad y cultura

2017· book· es· W2964451451 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth Romero, Oliver Santín Peña, Camelia Tigau

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coordinación de Humanidades, Centro de Investigaciones sobre América del Norte eBooks · 2017
Typebook
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural and Food Production Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En esta obra, complemento de Canada hoy. Economia, recursos naturales, ciencia y tecnologia (CISAN. 2016) se analizan diversos aspectos de la politica y la sociedad canadienses a partir de las dinamicas puestas en marcha durante la administracion conservadora del primer ministro Stephen Harper (2006-2015). El enfoque se centra en rescatar la tradicion multicultural de Canada, a traves del estudio de problematicas gubernamentales y sociales. Este volumen se divide en dos partes: la primera expone diferentes posturas y acciones del gobierno canadiense, asi como las politicas publicas implementadas a finales del siglo XX y principios del XXI, mientras que la segunda se dedica a los estudios referentes al desarrollo e integracion social; la identidad canadiense, y la influencia de la tecnologia en la vida cotidiana, entre otros asuntos. Esta dirigido, principalmente, al publico estudiantil y docente interesado en conocer el desarrollo y las areas de oportunidad que ha enfrentado Canada en los anos recientes. Asimismo, puede servir como fuente de consulta para la elaboracion de programas de cooperacion entre Mexico y Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.759

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.011
Science and technology studies0.0190.008
Scholarly communication0.0150.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coordinación de Humanidades, Centro de Investigaciones sobre América del Norte eBooksSame topicAgricultural and Food Production StudiesFrench-language works237,207