Discourse, Identity, Practice: Analyzing Instruction Librarians’ Conversations About Information Literacy and the Social Web
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Librarians communicate regularly on the Information Literacy Instruction (ILI-L) listserv about integrating the Social Web in their library instruction practices. Critical discourse analysis of these postings reveals a concern with control, which makes mastery of these technologies a priority, along with a fear in the profession of ceding pedagogical authority.Les bibliothécaires discutent régulièrement sur la liste de diffusion Information Literacy Instruction (ILI-L) de l'intégration du web social aux pratiques de formation documentaire de leur bibliothèque. Une analyse critique du discours de ces communications révèle une préoccupation par rapport au contrôle, faisant de la maîtrise de ces technologies une priorité, ainsi que la crainte d'une perte d'autorité pédagogique pour la profession.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.025 | 0.263 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it