MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964486161 · doi:10.1101/728816

Polygenic risk scores of several subtypes of epilepsies in a founder population

2019· preprint· en· W2964486161 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Claudia Moreau, Rose‐Marie Rébillard, Stefan Wolking, Jacques L. Michaud, Frédérique Tremblay, Alexandre Girard, Joanie Bouchard, Berge A. Minassian, Catherine Laprise, Patrick Cossette, Simon Girard

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersCompute CanadaGenome Canada
KeywordsGeeEpilepsyIdiopathic generalized epilepsyHeritabilityCohortGeneralized epilepsyPopulationMedicineGeneralized estimating equationGenotypingEndophenotypePsychiatryPediatricsPsychologyInternal medicineBiologyGeneticsGenotypeCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Importance Epilepsy is defined as a group of neurological disorders characterized by epileptic seizures, brief episodes of symptoms that are caused by abnormal or excessive neuronal activity in the brain. Epilepsy affects around 3 percent of individuals. In the past 10 years, many groups have been working to better understand the complex genetic mechanisms underlying epilepsy. Together, they studied many different genetic mechanisms, but there is still a substantial missing heritability component in epilepsy genetics. Objective Here, we used polygenic risk scores (PRS) to quantify the cumulative effects of a number of variants, which may individually have a very small effect on susceptibility. Design We calculated PRS in 522 French-Canadian epilepsy patients divided into seven subtypes and French-Canadian controls. Setting All study participants (cases and controls) were selected based on their French-Canadian ancestry. Participants The epilepsy cohort was composed of families of at least three affected individuals with Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy (IGE) or Non-acquired Focal Epilepsy (NAFE) previously collected and diagnosed by neurologists following the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) criteria. Exposures All samples were processed on a common genotyping array. Main outcomes and Results We show that the area under the curve (AUC) is almost always slightly greater than 0.5, especially in patients with IGE and subtypes. We also looked at the association of the PRS with the different phenotypes using a linear mixed effects model estimated by generalized estimating equation (GEE) with the pairwise identity-by-descent (IBD) matrix as a random effect. P-values of GEE were consistent with AUC calculations. Conclusions and Relevance Globally, we support the notion that PRS and SNP-based heritability provide reliable measures to rightfully estimate the contribution of genetic factors to the pathophysiological mechanism of epilepsies, but further studies are needed on PRS before they can be used clinically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207