MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964499970 · doi:10.1002/awwa.1342

Asset Management Best Practices: Keeping Ahead of the Curve

2019· article· en· W2964499970 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Fodchuk, Mike Garaci

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Water Works Association · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsset managementLegislationIT asset managementBusinessBest practiceAsset (computer security)Key (lock)Risk analysis (engineering)Pipeline (software)FinanceProcess managementOperations managementActuarial scienceEconomicsComputer scienceComputer securityManagementPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Takeaways Impending legislation is driving Canadian utilities to take a proactive stance on their asset management plans. Seven Canadian utilities shared their strategies and best practices for evaluating, fixing, and managing pipeline assets. It's important for utilities to establish a comprehensive, forward‐thinking asset management framework that includes structured data collection and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.067
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.092
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0670.092
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0200.016
Scholarly communication0.0340.022
Open science0.0080.010
Research integrity0.0070.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Water Works AssociationSame topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207