Finned Space Radiator Performance Analysis Using Computational Methods
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Satellites are typically subjected to large temperature variations due to its orbit, whereas some satellite's equipment sharp temperature limits must be observed in order not to jeopardize satellite's mission. Designed to operate in passive satellites' thermal control, space radiators can be a valuable asset, rejecting heat generated by electronic components and minimizing absorption of heat from external sources (especially the Sun). The present work presents a numerical methodology for performing the analysis of space radiators, and a comparison between a plane radiator and finned radiator in critical operating conditions is presented. The governing equations have been discretized in a two-dimensional grid using a finite volume scheme and the resulting system was solved using Thomas Algorithm in an iterative process, concatenated in two algorithms. The results obtained show the temperature profiles for both radiators studied and a performance analysis is performed, showing the best geometrical configuration for the finned radiator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it