MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964532162

CHANGES TO CANADA'S ANTI-DUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTY LAWS FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM

2000· article· en· W2964532162 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P M Saroli, Greg Tereposky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Bar Review · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Trade Organization Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTribunalDutyDumpingTransparency (behavior)International tradeLawBusinessCornerstonePolitical scienceEconomicsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Special Import Measures Act (or SIMA) is the cornerstone of Canada's Antidumping and countervailing duty system. The Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act is also an important component of this system. On April 15, 2000, an Act to Amend the Special Import Measures Act and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act and related amendments to the Special Import Measures Regulations and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules, entered into force. This package of amendments, which implements recommendations contained in the December 1996 Parliamentary Report on the Special Import Measures Act, introduced significant changes to the SIMA system that are aimed at improving the efficiency, transparency and fairness of Canadian anti-dumping and countervailing duty proceedings. This paper explains and assesses these changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Bar ReviewSame topicWorld Trade Organization LawFrench-language works237,207