La politica antiottomana dei Gonzaga tra spirito di crociata e interessi dinastici: XVI-XVII secolo
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For decades there has been a continuous complaint on the lack of an authentic interest and of a general scientific concern regarding the perseverance of the concept “crusade” in modern centuries; in recent years, however, much has been published, although the prevailing interpretation has been explaining the persistence of anti-ottoman military expeditions not as a continuation of the crusade spirit, but merely as an expression of sheer realpolitik or of dynastic interests. Truth be told, without denying the good reasons that lie behind this interpretation, it is the actual inquiry of events and of people that took part in the Gonzaga’s expeditions between the late sixteenth and early seventeenth century, that seem to limit this assumption, especially with the key figure of Carlo Gonzaga Nevers, whose “big dream” of conquering Constantinople and of a “Catholic-Protestant crusade”, spot him together with history’s major players of the first quarter of the seventeenth century. Although this is an eminently “evenemential” work, it provides indeed a still-to-be-completed historical framework, which is not only of great historiographical exclusive interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it