10.1016/s0967-0653(98)85750-5
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Bouvet Triple Junction is located where the Antarctic, south American and African plates meet in the south Atlantic. Two oceanographic expeditions were carried out in this region in 1994 and 1996 by the Institute of Marine Geology, CNR (Bologna), and the Geology Institute of the Russian Academy of Science (Moscow) under the sponsorship of the Italian Antarctic Research Program (PNRA). The main objectives of these expeditions were to define the structural, morphological and petrographical differences of the three divergent margins that meet in the Bouvet region, and to clarify the evolution in space and time of the geometry of the Triple Junction. Single and multichannel seismic reflection, gravimetric and magnetometric profiles were obtained during the first cruise, with the R/V Akademik Strakhov, in addition to medium resolution multibeam bathymetry of the Bouvet island area and in the southern portion of the Mid Atlantic Ridge. The second cruise, carried out with the R/V Gelendzhik, completed the bathymetric survey of the entire Triple Junction region using an high resolution multibeam system. Seafloor sampling was carried out by dredging in both cruises. Some of the data obtained during these two expeditions are reported in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".