Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infrasound is low frequency sound outside of the range of human hearing (<20Hz). Despite this, infrasound is still capable of affecting an individual’s arousal. In an attempt to build on previous research, the present study had participants explore a commercial haunted house in which there were a variety of fearful stimuli. Participants in this study were randomly assigned to either a condition of infrasound exposure prior to exploring the haunted house, or no exposure before exploring. The intent of this study was to look the effect of infrasound on fear. Participants fear and arousal were evaluated via self-report questionnaire, and through video footage from the participants’ direct point of view. Furthermore the effects of infrasound on physiological arousal were examined, both in terms nervous system activity as well as cardiovascular activity. In addition to these direct physiological measures. This data was also correlated with participant personality characteristics and any potential pseudoscientific beliefs that the participants may have held to control for any potential confounds. The researchers hypothesized that infrasound will lead to higher levels of arousal and fear associated responses than the non-infrasound condition. Discipline: Psychology Faculty Mentor: Dr. Rodney Schmaltz
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".