Spin-orbit excitons in CoO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CoO has an odd number of electrons in its unit cell, and therefore is expected to be metallic. Yet, CoO is strongly insulating owing to significant electronic correlations, thus classifying it as a Mott insulator. We investigate the magnetic fluctuations in CoO using neutron spectroscopy. The strong and spatially far-reaching exchange constants reported recently [P. M. Sarte et al., Phys. Rev. B 98, 024415 (2018)], combined with the single-ion spin-orbit coupling of similar magnitude [R. A. Cowley et al., Phys. Rev. B 88, 205117 (2013)] results in significant mixing between $j{}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ spin-orbit levels in the low-temperature magnetically ordered phase. The high degree of entanglement, combined with the structural domains originating from the Jahn-Teller structural distortion at $\ensuremath{\sim}300\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$, make the magnetic excitation spectrum highly structured in both energy and momentum. We extend previous theoretical work on ${\mathrm{PrTl}}_{3}$ [W. J. L. Buyers et al., Phys. Rev. B 11, 266 (1975)] to construct a mean-field and multilevel spin-orbit exciton model employing the aforementioned spin exchange and spin-orbit coupling parameters for coupled ${\mathrm{Co}}^{2+}$ ions lying on a rocksalt lattice. This parametrization, based on a tetragonally distorted type-II antiferromagnetic unit cell, captures both the sharp low-energy excitations at the magnetic zone center, and the energy broadened peaks at the zone boundary. However, the model fails to describe the momentum dependence of the excitations at high-energy transfers, where the neutron response decays faster with momentum than the ${\mathrm{Co}}^{2+}$ form factor. We discuss such a failure in terms of a possible breakdown of localized spin-orbit excitons at high-energy transfers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".