Migración forzada: la otra cara de la migración internacional. El caso de colombianos en Ecuador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo es producto de la investigación sobre migración forzada de colombianos dentro de Colombia, en Ecuador y en Canadá. A partir de un análisis cuantitativo y cualitativo de los censos de migrantes colombianos se da cuenta de otras dimensiones de la migración internacional: aquella que no está relacionada con el cálculo racional costo-beneficio sino con el imperativo de salvar la vida en contextos marcados por el dominio y la presión de actores armados diversos. El artículo se centra en el caso de migrantes colombianos a Ecuador y su relación con la migración ocurrida en el interior del territorio colombiano. Muestra como el marco conceptual y legal sobre migrantes y refugiados no soluciona en su totalidad, los problemas de los migrantes colombianos en Ecuador. Palabras Clave: Migración, Desplazamiento forzado, Conflicto armado, Ecuador, Colombia ABSTRACT FORCED MIGRATION: THE OTHER SIDE OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION This article shows the results of the research about forced migration of Colombians within Colombia, and into Ecuador and Canada. Based on a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Colombian migrants’ census, the article inquires other dimensions of international migration: one that is not related to the rational cost-benefit calculation but to the imperative of saving lives in contexts marked by pressure domination and various armed actors. The article focuses on the case of Colombian migrants into Ecuador and its relation to migration occurred within the Colombian territory. It shows how the conceptual and legal framework about migrants and refugees did not resolve the problems of Colombian migrants in Ecuador. Keywords: Migration, Forced Displacement, Armed Confl ict, Ecuador, Colombia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".