MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964801949 · doi:10.1109/iemdc.2019.8785199

Differential Evolution Based Stator Flux Linkage Estimation Considering Saturation, Inverter Non-Linearity and Saliency in PMSM

2019· article· en· W2964801949 on OpenAlexaff
Animesh Kundu, Aiswarya Balamurali, Goudong Feng, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlux linkageControl theory (sociology)LinearityStatorSaturation (graph theory)InverterMathematicsPhysicsComputer scienceEngineeringInduction motorDirect torque controlVoltageElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate determination of stator flux linkage is important for advanced control techniques such as loss minimization to determine the optimal current distribution considering saturation, cross-saturation and temperature effects in the motor. In order to derive a precise flux linkage map in the direct and quadrature axes, this paper presents a method to determine the stator flux linkage using differential evolution algorithm (DE). A conventional two-axis model is modified to incorporate inverter non-linearity, magnetic saturation and cross-saturation. Based on the non-linearity, a fitness function is derived to optimize through DE and using the optimized results, flux linkage contour is estimated as a function of d- and q- axis currents and speed. The novelty of this paper is to estimate flux linkage including the non-linearity functions such as saturation, cross-saturation, temperature variation and dead-time distortion considering the demagnetizing current of the motor (id ≠ 0) and quantifying all the non-linearity factors with DE. An improved penalty function is developed to track the VSI non-linearity, saturation, cross-saturation and temperature. The effectiveness of the developed method is verified on a 4.25 kW laboratory interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM)prototype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207