Imagerie multimodale en choriorétinopathie séreuse centrale aiguë et chronique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De nombreuses théories ont été proposées concernant la pathophysiologie de la choriorétinopathie séreuse centrale (CRSC), sans consensus sur son étiologie exacte. La recherche a mené à diverses possibilités de traitement qui ciblent des mécanismes précis. L’imagerie multimodale, y compris l’autofluorescence du fond de l’œil (FAF), la tomographie par cohérence optique (TCO), l’angiographie fluorescéinique et l’angiographie au vert d’indocyanine, identifie les altérations vasculaires et structurelles qui peuvent confirmer le diagnostic de CRSC et adapter efficacement le traitement pour aider à maximiser le pronostic visuel chez ces patients. Les caractéristiques d’imagerie de la CRSC et des exemples de cas seront explorés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".