“Esa paz blanca, esa paz de muerte”: Peacetime, Wartime, and Black Impossible Chronos in Postconflict Colombia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen El 24 de agosto de 2016, el presidente colombiano Juan Manuel Santos anunció el final formal de la larga guerra de cincuenta años con la guerrilla de las FARC, ya que el grupo acordó deponer las armas y participar en las elecciones generales de 2018 como un partido político. El acuerdo de paz fue recibido con una mezcla de emoción y escepticismo. Desde entonces, casi seiscientos activistas han sido asesinados, la violencia homicida contra la juventud urbana sigue alta y el prospecto de paz positiva en los territorios negros e indígenas es en el mejor de los casos esquivo. En este artículo, me pregunto: ¿cómo entender la transición a la paz como supuestamente un momento mágico cuando lostiempos‐de‐guerray tiempos‐de‐paz son experimentados como evento a‐temporal acuerdo a la alteridad racial de los sujetos? ¿Pueden los marcos normativo de conflicto / pos‐conflicto y paz / guerra, explicar la trans‐historicidad de la experiencia negra en sociedades de la diáspora africana? [afro‐pesimismo, violencia racial, construcción de paz, paz liberal, protesto negro]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".