MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964839871 · doi:10.14740/jocmr3886

Profiling of Target Molecules for Immunotherapy in Mesenchymal Tumors

2019· article· en· W2964839871 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Takuma Hayashi, Tomoyuki Ichimura, Kenji Sano, Susumu Tonegawa, Yae Kanai, Dorit Zharhary, Hiroyuki Aburatani, Nobuo Yaegashi, Ikuo Konishi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIchiro Kanehara Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Sciences and Medical CareVanderbilt University Medical CenterVanderbilt University
KeywordsMedicineMesenchymal stem cellProfiling (computer programming)ImmunotherapyCancer researchPathologyImmunologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of anti-human signal molecules monoclonal antibod-ies (mAbs) for malignant tumors therapy has achieved consid-erable success in recent years. Antibody drug conjugates are powerful new clinical treatment options for lymphomas and solid tumors, and immunomodulatory antibodies have also re-cently achieved remarkable clinical success. The development of therapeutic antibodies requires a deep understanding of ma-lignant tumor serology, protein-engineering techniques, mech-anisms of action and resistance, and the interplay between the immune system and tumorigenesis. This review outlines the fundamental strategies, which are required to establish anti-body therapies for patients with mesenchymal tumors through iterative approaches to target and antibody selection, extend-ing from preclinical studies to human trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.538
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine ResearchSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207