MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

An analysis of the temporal, age, and gender trends in human papillomavirus virus (HPV)-related versus non-HPV-related head and neck cancers (HNC) in Alberta, Canada.

2013· article· en· W2964860937 on OpenAlexaffabout
Desirée Hao, Harold Lau, Longlong Huang, Corinne Doll, Joseph C. Dort, Lorraine Shack

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)CervixAnal cancerCancer registryPopulationCancerHead and neck cancerCervical cancerGynecologyInternal medicineOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e12505 Background: Recent epidemiologic studies have suggested that the incidence of HPV-associated HNC is increasing. This study assessed temporal, age-specific and gender specific changes in cancer incidence for HPV- versus non-HPV associated HNC compared with other HPV versus non-HPV associated malignancies in a population-based setting. Methods: We used the Alberta Cancer Registry, a population-based registry of all cancers diagnosed in the province of Alberta, Canada (population est. 3.6 million), to identify patients diagnosed with cancers of the oropharynx, cervix, vulva, vagina, anus, and penis (HPV-associated group) and compared this with non-oropharyngeal cancers of the head and neck and lung cancer (non-HPV associated, modifiable risk group) between January 1, 1975 and December 31, 2009. The age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) for each cancer by gender and age-specific incidence was estimated with the annual percentage change (APC) assessed using Joinpoint regression. Results: The ASIR for oropharyngeal cancers (OPC) increased over time for both men (APC 3.5) and women (APC 1.5) with rapid increases seen in men under 35 (APC 27.3). Non-oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck had a higher ASIR overall with moderate temporal increases (APC 2.5) and age-specific increases highest in those aged 55 to 74. ASIR for anal canal cancers also increased over time, with greater increases amongst younger females, in contrast to OPC. By comparison, the ASIR of cervix cancer declined with more significant decreases in younger females; while the rates of other HPV-associated cancers (vulva, vagina, penile) showed little change. The ASIR for lung cancer decreased after 1987 (APC -1.5) for men and continued to moderately increase for women. Conclusions: Our findings suggest the greatest increases in OPC are occurring in younger men. Programs of HPV prevention such as vaccination should be explored to reduce the incidence of OPC in males.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicHead and Neck Cancer Studies→French-language works237,207→