MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964868331

Cyber Links Help Anglo-Indians to Preserve Culture

2008· article· en· W2964868331 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lionel Lumb

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Anglo-Indian Studies · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiaspora, migration, transnational identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaIndependence (probability theory)State (computer science)EthnologyHistoryGeographyPolitical scienceMedia studiesSociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An Anglo-Indian these days is almost a state of mind. Many who became part of the community’s diaspora after India and Pakistan gained independence in 1947 never declare themselves as Anglo-Indians (AIs), and seem eager to disappear into their host societies in Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. But there are some who care enough about that unique heritage to try to preserve and celebrate it, and have done so with international gatherings every three years: in Britain in 1989; in Toronto, Canada, in 1992; in Perth, Australia, in 1995; and last year in India itself, officially in Bangalore but with a spirited follow-up in Calcutta, home to the largest number of AIs through the centuries. The year 2001 will see them gather in Auckland, New Zealand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Anglo-Indian StudiesSame topicDiaspora, migration, transnational identityFrench-language works237,207