MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964906336 · doi:10.1080/14786435.2019.1649499

Effects of pulsed laser surface treatments on microstructural characteristics and hardness of CrCoNi medium-entropy alloy

2019· article· en· W2964906336 on OpenAlexaff
Linjiang Chai, Kang Xiang, Jiying Xia, Vahid Fallah, K.L. Murty, Zhongwen Yao, Bin Gan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Entropy Alloys Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquiaxed crystalsMaterials scienceMicrostructureAlloyAnnealing (glass)Electron backscatter diffractionLaserGrain sizeLaser power scalingGrain boundaryComposite materialMetallurgyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hot-swaged/annealed CrCoNi medium-entropy alloy (MEA) was surface-treated by pulsed laser at two different powers (400 and 200 W). Microstructural characteristics of the laser-modified zones were characterised and analysed by energy dispersive spectroscopy, electron backscatter diffraction and electron channelling contrast imaging techniques. Results show that melting and rapid solidification occur on the surfaces of both laser-treated specimens, and profuse annealing twins existing in the initial microstructures are essentially eliminated in the melting zone (MZ) with plentiful low-angle boundaries appearing. Meanwhile, the initial equiaxed grains are replaced by new grains in the MZ with either granular or columnar appearance (in the 2D cross-sectional views). These grains are comprised of fine cellular structures with relatively uniform sizes (∼1–2 μm in width/diameter), the formation of which is related to the segregation of Cr during solidification. With the laser power decreasing from 400 to 200 W, the volume of the MZ and grain sizes in its interior are reduced. This is due to less heat supply and faster cooling caused by reducing the laser power. Hardness tests reveal that the surfaces of both the laser-treated specimens are slightly softened (by 10–20%), and quantitative analyses suggest that this is mainly related to grain coarsening and the disappearance of annealing twins in the MZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied PhysicsSame topicHigh Entropy Alloys StudiesFrench-language works237,207