MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964932413 · doi:10.3390/jmse7080246

Multigene Genetic-Programming-Based Models for Initial Dilution of Laterally Confined Vertical Buoyant Jets

2019· article· en· W2964932413 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaohui Yan, Abdolmajid Mohammadian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Marine Science and Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsGenetic programmingGeneralizationDilutionGenetic algorithmJet (fluid)MathematicsComputer scienceApplied mathematicsMechanicsAlgorithmPhysicsStatistical physicsMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new approach based on the multigene genetic-programming (MGGP) technique is proposed to predict initial dilution of vertical buoyant jets subjected to lateral confinement. The models are trained and tested using experimental data, and the good matches demonstrate the generalization and predictive capabilities of the evolved MGGP-based models. The best Pareto-optimal MGGP-based model is also compared with the model evolved using a single-gene genetic-programming (SGGP) algorithm and an existing regression-based empirical equation. The comparisons reveal the superiority of the MGGP-based model. This study confirms that the MGGP technique is promising in evolving an explicit, accurate, and compact model, and the developed models can be employed to estimate effectively and efficiently the dilution properties of a laterally confined vertical buoyant jet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Marine Science and EngineeringSame topicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsFrench-language works237,207