André Schiffrin et Éric Hazan, emblèmes d’une radicale indépendance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine le discours élaboré par l’éditeur André Schiffrin durant les années 2000. Nous observerons la transformation d’un discours éditorial : les textes de Schiffrin, de mémoires autobiographiques, acquièrent une portée politique, au point même de devenir manifestes de l’édition indépendante. Le discours de réception qui se cristallise autour des propos de Schiffrin éclaire par ailleurs un second discours, celui de son propre éditeur, Éric Hazan, le fondateur de La Fabrique. À partir de l’analyse croisée des positions objectives de Schiffrin dans le champ et de leur parole respective, nous proposerons une définition de la notion d’indépendance éditoriale. C’est le portrait d’un écosystème éditorial en mutation que nous brossons, en soulignant l’importance des discours d’éditeurs dans la politisation de leur métier au tournant du millénaire. Ultimement, nous mettrons au jour le rôle de ces discours dans la mise en place d’une guerre de position qui vise à fissurer une hégémonie culturelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".