Giacomo Dell edonne y Giuseppe Martinico. The Canadian Contribution to a Comparative Law of Secession. Legacies of the Quebec Secession Reference, Palgrave-Macmillan, 2019
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La obra editada por Giacomo Delledonne y Giuseppe Martinico viene a conmemorar el vigésimo aniversario del célebre Dictamen del Tribunal Supremo de Canadá (TS) sobre la Secesión de Quebec. En un contexto de renovado interés por parte de la doctrina en los movimientos soberanistas, especialmente a raíz del procés catalán, esta obra nos ofrece un conjunto de artículos escritos por académicos de amplia trayectoria y renombre internacional, quienes reflexionan sobre el contenido y legado de un Dictamen que ha supuesto un cambio de paradigma a la hora de abordar la secesión en un estado democrático con respecto al tradicional del federalismo estadounidense caracterizado por negar tajantemente cualquier posibilidad de la misma. Publicación en línea: 31 julio 2019
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".