Territórios urbanos saudáveis: itinerários, vicissitudes e dialogias
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present work is based on the reflection around some aspects, considered important, for the understanding of the notion of Healthy Urban Territories. Inserted in the epistemological context of a science committed to social transformation, the reflection here is part of an investigation - whose presuppositions coined in the scope of Collective Health - are placed in interaction with concepts outlined by other disciplines, and is organized under the research methodology the broader community of research and the shared production of knowledge. The emergence of the notion in question can be related to the combination of some significant processes in the history of social policies: the important Healthy Cities movement, initiated in Canada in the 1980s; of the expanded health project conceived by the Sanitary Movement from the second half of the 1970s, and partly consolidated with the SUS; and the currents of political theory - in some cases experienced - of processes of political-financial-operational decentralization of the management of public resources. It is important to highlight that the locus of the research that subsidizes this work takes place in the set of favelas of Manguinhos (for many, Manguinhos Complex), located in the northern region of the city of Rio de Janeiro, characterized as a territory vulnerable in its social, environmental dimensions , political and economic. In this way, the itinerary will highlight concepts of Healthy Urban Areas, highlighting the vicissitudes of Manguinhos as to the limits and possibilities of its experimentation, highlighting the subjects living in the territory in question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it