MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965002381 · doi:10.1115/1.4044407

Estimation of Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Rate in Nuclear Piping System

2019· article· en· W2965002381 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov chain Monte CarloPipingComputer scienceBayesian probabilityBayesian inferenceApproximate Bayesian computationComputationAlgorithmMathematical optimizationInferenceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Flow-accelerated corrosion (FAC) is a life-limiting factor for the piping network of the primary heat transport system (PHTS) in CANDU® reactors. The pipe wall thinning caused by FAC is monitored by carrying out periodic in-service inspections (ISI) to ensure the fitness-for-service of the piping system. Accurate prediction of the lifetime of various components in the PHTS piping network requires estimation of FAC thinning rate. The traditional Bayesian inference techniques commonly employed for parameter estimation are computationally costly. This paper presents an inexpensive and intuitive simulation-based Bayesian approach to FAC rate estimation, called approximate Bayesian computation using Markov chain Monte Carlo (ABC-MCMC). ABC-MCMC is a likelihood-free Bayesian computation scheme that generates samples directly from an approximate posterior distribution by simulating data sets from a forward model. The efficiency of ABC-MCMC is demonstrated by presenting a comparison with a likelihood-based Bayesian computation scheme, Metropolis-Hastings (MH) algorithm, using a practical data-based example. Furthermore, an innovative step has been proposed for reducing the Markov chain burn-in time in the proposed scheme. To indicate the need of a Bayesian approach in quantifying the uncertainties related to the FAC model parameters, results from the linear regression method, a common industrial approach, are also presented in this study. The numerical results show a notable reduction in computational time, suggesting that ABC-MCMC is an efficient alternative to the traditional Bayesian inference methods, specifically for handling noisy degradation data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it