MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965010462 · doi:10.1021/acsaem.9b00860

Hydrogen Bubble Templating of Fractal Ni Catalysts for Water Oxidation in Alkaline Media

2019· article· en· W2965010462 on OpenAlexafffund
Minghui Hao, Valerie Charbonneau, Nadège Nzone Fomena, Julie Gaudet, David Bruce, Sébastien Garbarino, David A. Harrington, Daniel Guay

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Energy Materials · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaZincNyx Energy Solutions (Canada)Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOverpotentialTafel equationOxygen evolutionElectrolyteSuperhydrophilicityChemical engineeringMaterials scienceBubblePolarization (electrochemistry)WettingPorosityHydrogenAlkaline water electrolysisContact angleWater splittingCatalysisElectrodeInorganic chemistryChemistryElectrolysisPhotocatalysisElectrochemistryComposite materialPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic hydrogen bubble templating of Ni (Ni DHBT ) electrodes was used to prepare highly porous films with enhanced properties toward the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Upon varying the electrodeposition conditions, Ni films with a macroporous primary structure and highly porous cauliflowerlike secondary structure were formed. These films are able to develop an extended electrochemically active surface area, up to 270-fold increase compared to a Ni plate. They exhibit stable overpotential (η 250 = 540 mV) at j = 250 mA cm geometric –2 in 1 M KOH electrolyte, which is 300 mV less positive than at the Ni plate. Fe incorporation onto these Ni DHBT structures can further lower OER overpotentials to η 250 = 310 mV. Ni DHBT films are remarkably stable over prolonged polarization and are characterized by a low Tafel slope (29 mV/decade) that extends up to j = 100 mA cm geometric –2, attributed to both superaerophobic characteristics with a contact angle of ca. 160° between the surface and an air bubble and superhydrophilic characteristics with less than 25° between the surface and a water droplet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Energy MaterialsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207