KONDISI SOSIAL EKONOMI NELAYAN DI DESA BULAWAN II, KECAMATAN KOTABUNAN, KABUPATEN BOLAANG MONGONDOW TIMUR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstrakTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kondisi sosial dan ekonomi nelayan di Desa Bulawan II Kecamatan Kotabunan Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow Timur. Jenis penelitian ini adalah deskriptif, dimana penelitian bersifat deskriptif merupakan penelitian yang bertujuan untuk mengungkapkan suatu kenyataan sosial dengan jalan mendeskripsikan secara tepat sifat-sifat individu, keadaan, gejala, kelompok tertentu berkenaan dengan masalah unit yang diteliti dalam masyarakat. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah nelayan penangkap ikan di Desa Bulawan II, Kecamatan Kotabunan Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow Timur. Berdasarkan pengamatan awal jumlah populasi nelayan yang ada di Desa Bulawan II sebanyak 23 orang. Sampel yang diambil sebesar 20% atau sebanyak 20 orang dengan menggunakan metode pengambilan secara acak sederhana atau simple random sampling. Keberadaan nelayan di Desa Bulawan II sampai saat ini belum banyak diberitakan baik berupa tulisan-tulisan ilmiah maupun penelitian-penelitian, bacaan-bacaan berbentuk artikel dan lain sebagainya, sehingga perlu adanya penelitian yang mengungkapkan tentang keadaan kondisi sosial ekonomi nelayan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".