MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2965091855 · doi:10.1109/isie.2019.8781092

On the Occupancy Measurement and Analysis for Residential Applications

2019· article· en· W2965091855 on OpenAlexafffund
Alben Cardenas, Samuel Piche, David Meunier, Luis Rueda, Kodjo Agbossou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersNatural Resources CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOccupancyOccupancy grid mappingComputer sciencePrincipal component analysisEnergy consumptionWaveletEnergy (signal processing)Field (mathematics)Data miningStatisticsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analysis of buildings occupancy has become a relevant research field following energy management and smart grid trends. Occupancy can be associated with energy needs, and therefore a good knowledge of occupancy behavior can substantially help to manage better energy sources and to optimize overall consumption. In this work, we analyze the use of commonly employed occupancy measurements under the residential scenario. We present the design methodology, the implementation, the experimental tests and occupancy analysis of a multi-sensor measurement prototype. We propose a signal processing methodology based on Haar wavelets and multivariate analysis using the Normalized Cross-Correlation and Principal Component Analysis to improve the linear regression model of occupancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization→French-language works237,207→