MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965100520 · doi:10.29105/pgc3.5-5

Financiando esfuerzos contra el cambio climático en América Latina

2016· article· es· W2965100520 on OpenAlexaff
Sandra Guzmán, Mariana del Castillo, Alin Moncada

Bibliographic record

VenuePolítica Globalidad y Ciudadanía · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Canadian institutionsPrivy Council Office
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente artículo es producto de una revisión bibliográfica, cuyo objetivo consistió en presentar una visión sobre la evolución del financiamiento climático a nivel global, y cómo éste ha impactado en la región de América Latina, con particular énfasis en la participación del financiamiento en materia de energías alternativas y renovables. Se aplicó el método de análisis, con un enfoque cualitativo, diseño no experimental, bajo un nivel documental-bibliográfico transversal. Tras la revisión documental se realiza un breve análisis de cómo se ubica México en estas discusiones y las necesidades nacionales que se derivan de los procesos internacionales como el Acuerdo de París. Se concluye que se requiere una acción conjunta, coordinada y determinante de todos los actores involucrados. Los gobiernos nacionales y locales, el sector privado, los fondos multilaterales, la banca, la sociedad civil, etc.Palabras clave: América Latina, cambio climático, desarrollo sustentable, y financiamiento.AbstractThis article is the product of a literature review, whose aim consisted in submitting a vision about the evolution of the funding of climate change in a global level, and how this has had an impact on the Latin America region, with a special focus on the funding participation with regard to alternative and renewable energies. The method of analysis was applied with a qualitative approach, non-experimental design, under a documentary-literature cross sectional level. After the documentary review a brief analysis is done about where Mexico is in these arguments and the needs that arise from the international processes such as the Paris Agreement. It concludes that it is necessary a coordinate, determining and joint action from all of the involved actors. The local and national governments, the private sector, multilateral funds, banking, civil society, etc.Key words: Latin America, Climate Change, Sustainable Development, Funding.Cómo referenciar este artículo:Guzmán, S., Castillo, M., & Moncada, A. (2017). Financiando esfuerzos contra el cambio climático en américa latina. Política,Globalidad y Ciudadanía, 65-74.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolítica Globalidad y CiudadaníaSame topicSustainable Development and Environmental PolicyFrench-language works237,207