LES LIMITES DE LA BONNE FOI EN MATIERE DE VENTE: LE CAS DES VICES CACHES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a result of articles 6, 7 and 1375 of the Civil Code of Quebec, a person's duty to conduct himself in good faith has become a fundamental rule of Quebec civil law. The warranty of quality is an obligation of general application by which all sellers (including the manufacturer, wholesaler, retailer, builder, and real estate developer) are obliged to ensure the quality of the property being sold. This article highlights the current legal applications and the practical consequences of the seller's duty to act in good faith principally with regard to the warranty. In particular, the following points are examined: the right to exclude the warranty, the duty to disclose defects, the requirement for notice within a reasonable time and the liability of the seller for damages. The duty of the seller to disclose known latent defects is one of the foundations of the warranty . The recognition of good faith as a rule of Quebec civil law consolidates the duty to disclose known facts that seriously affect the state of the property to be sold.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".