MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965155452 · doi:10.12943/cnr.2018.00004

MACHINE-LEARNING ALGORITHM FOR SHIELDED SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS DETECTION

2019· article· en· W2965155452 on OpenAlex
Eugene Masala, L. Blomeley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCNL Nuclear Review · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear Laboratories
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverfittingComputer scienceAlgorithmConvolutional neural networkArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligencePoolingMachine learningDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A machine-learning algorithm has been implemented by use of a neural network as a preliminary study on the applicability of this method to special nuclear materials detection. The algorithm predicts the presence of the 238 U isotope when learning from a gamma spectrum data measured with a high-purity germanium detector from a sample of depleted uranium. In this work, both a fully connected neural network and a convolutional neural network have been implemented, and the performance of different configurations of the network has been studied. The use of convolutional network showed better performance over the fully connected network, with cost function and success rate values supporting a better prediction while avoiding overfitting. Furthermore, implemented network features such as filtering, max-pooling, dropout regularization, and momentum optimization also showed improved prediction performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it