MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965174703 · doi:10.1002/anie.201907674

Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Nanosheets Grown on Multi‐Channel Carbon Matrix to Catalyze Efficient CO<sub>2</sub> Electroreduction to HCOOH

2019· article· en· W2965174703 on OpenAlexaff
Subiao Liu, Xue Feng Lu, Jing Xiao, Xin Wang, Xiong Wen Lou

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMinistry of Education - Singapore
KeywordsOverpotentialFaraday efficiencyElectrolyteElectrocatalystMaterials scienceChemical engineeringCarbon fibersAdsorptionElectron transferDegradation (telecommunications)Inorganic chemistryElectrodeChemistryElectrochemistryPhysical chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bi2O3 nanosheets were grown on a conductive multiple channel carbon matrix (MCCM) for CO2RR. The obtained electrocatalyst shows a desirable partial current density of ca. 17.7 mA cm−2 at a moderate overpotential, and it is highly selective towards HCOOH formation with Faradaic efficiency approaching 90 % in a wide potential window and its maximum value of 93.8 % at −1.256 V. It also exhibits a maximum energy efficiency of 55.3 % at an overpotential of 0.846 V and long‐term stability of 12 h with negligible degradation. The superior performance is attributed to the synergistic contribution of the interwoven MCCM and the hierarchical Bi2O3 nanosheets, where the MCCM provides an accelerated electron transfer, increased CO2 adsorption, and a high ratio of pyrrolic‐N and pyridinic‐N, while ultrathin Bi2O3 nanosheets offer abundant active sites, lowered contact resistance and work function as well as a shortened diffusion pathway for electrolyte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations354
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207