<i>In situ</i> compatibilization of a polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene ternary blend through Friedel–Crafts alkylation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The Friedel–Crafts alkylation reaction has been applied to reactively compatibilize a ternary blend of high‐density polyethylene (HDPE), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS). The reactions were carried out in an internal mixer using varying catalyst concentrations. The resulting compatibilizer was quantified after Soxhlet extraction. In addition, p ‐substitution due to the grafting of alkyl groups onto the PS benzene ring was identified via nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The size of the PS domain in the reactive compositions is decreased by 80%. Moreover, the phase in which PS droplets were dispersed varied, that is, in the nonreactive blends they were found in the PP phase and in the reactive blends they shifted toward the HDPE phase. The effect of the compatibilizing agent was to improve the mechanical properties of the blend. Even with the lowest catalyst content, the properties of elongation‐at‐break, tensile strength, toughness, and elastic modulus showed improvements. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020 , 137 , 48295.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".