MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965205819 · doi:10.1002/jcsm.12469

Associations between severe co‐morbidity and muscle measures in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer patients

2019· article· en· W2965205819 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bjørn Henning Grønberg, Christine Damgaard Valan, Tarje Onsøien Halvorsen, Bjørg Sjøblom, Marit Slaaen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineLung cancerUnderweightPerformance statusCancerHounsfield scaleSarcopeniaOverweightGastroenterologyBody mass indexSurgeryComputed tomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Studies show that low skeletal muscle index (SMI) and low skeletal muscle density (SMD) are negative prognostic factors and associated with more toxicity from systemic therapy in cancer patients. However, muscle depletion can be caused by a range of diseases, and many cancer patients have significant co‐morbidity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there were associations between co‐morbidity and muscle measures in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. Methods Patients in a Phase III trial comparing two chemotherapy regimens in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer were analysed ( n = 436). Co‐morbidity was assessed using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS‐G), which rates co‐morbidity from 0 to 4 on 14 different organ scales. Severe co‐morbidity was defined as having any grades 3 and 4 CIRS‐G score. Muscle measures were assessed from baseline computed tomography slides at the L3 level using the SliceOMatic software. Results Complete data were available for 263 patients (60%). Median age was 66, 57.0% were men, 78.7% had performance status 0–1, 25.9% Stage IIIB, 11.4% appetite loss, 92.4% were current/former smokers, 22.8% were underweight, 43.7% had normal weight, 26.6% were overweight, and 6.8% obese. The median total CIRS‐G score was 7 (range: 0–16), and 48.2% had severe co‐morbidity. Mean SMI was 44.7 cm 2 /m 2 (range: 27–71), and the mean SMD was 37.3 Hounsfield units (HU) (range: 16–60). When comparing patients with and without severe co‐morbidity, there were no significant differences in median SMI (44.5 vs. 44.1 cm 2 /m 2 ; 0.70), but patients with severe co‐morbidity had a significantly lower median SMD (36 HU vs. 39 HU; 0.001), mainly due to a significant difference in SMD between those with severe heart disease and those without (32.5 vs. 37.9 HU; 0.002). Linear regression analyses confirmed the association between severe co‐morbidity and SMD both in the simple analysis (0.001) and the multiple analysis (0.037) adjusting for baseline characteristics. Stage of disease, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were significantly associated with SMI in both the simple and multiple analyses. Age and BMI were significantly associated with SMD in the simple analysis; and age, gender, and BMI were significantly associated in the multiple analysis. Conclusions There were no significant differences in SMI between patients with and patients without severe co‐morbidity, but patients with severe co‐morbidity had lower SMD than other patients, mainly due to severe heart disease. Co‐morbidity might be a confounder in studies of the clinical role of SMD in cancer patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and MuscleSame topicNutrition and Health in AgingFrench-language works237,207