MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965206392

SYNTHESIS OF 6BROMOOXO QUINAZOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR HARAMCOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES

2010· article· en· W2965206392 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ch. Rajveer, Ch. Swarnalatha, B. Stephen Rathinaraj, S. Sudhrshini

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryQuinazolineAnalgesicProton NMRBiological activityCombinatorial chemistryAnti-inflammatoryOrganic chemistryMedicinal chemistryIn vitroPharmacologyBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A number of substituted oxoquinazolines are known for their pharmacological importance like anti‐analgesic, anti‐inflammatory, and anti‐bacterial activity. In the present investigation is carried out for the synthesis of 2‐(6‐bromo‐2‐phenyl‐4‐oxoquinazolin‐3(4H)‐yl)‐N‐substituted acetamides to carry out their pharmacological activities. A number of oxoquinazoline derivatives have been synthesized, purified and characterized with the help of their analytical and spectral data (IR, NMR & Mass).The required ethyl [6‐bromo‐2‐phenyl‐4‐oxoquinazolin‐3(4H)‐yl]acetate has been synthesized from 6‐bromo‐2‐phenyl‐1,3,4‐benzoxazinone and ethyl glycinate. By the use of corresponding primary amines the N‐substituted acetamides were prepared. The synthesized compounds were screened for their anti‐bacterial activity, anti‐inflammatory activity and analgesic activity by standard methods. The compound shows Pharmacological activities in comparison with the standard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicSynthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic CompoundsFrench-language works237,207