MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965245763 · doi:10.4000/mimesis.1698

Di alcune tracce che il teatro deposita

2019· article· it· W2965245763 on OpenAlexaff
Enrico Pitozzi

Bibliographic record

VenueMimesis journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsDillon Consulting
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il teatro, come noto, deposita molte tracce, di cui poche però persistono. A volte sono pochissime, se si considera la volontà degli artisti, più o meno dichiarata, di liberarsi di ciò che non appartiene al presente del gesto scenico, così da evitare ogni forma di congelamento o definizione che non lascia margine di modifica. Contro l’idea di documento, il teatro convoca una memoria. È con questa postura che Gianni Manzella ed io abbiamo accolto l’invito di Gucci a curare una mostra da loro p...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMimesis journalSame topicEducational and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207