MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965259431 · doi:10.14288/1.0378174

The role of metamorphic and geochemical factors in the formation of gem corundum, spinel, and haüyne in metacarbonates of the Lake Harbour Group, Baffin Island, Canada

2019· article· en· W2965259431 on OpenAlexaffabout
Philippe M. Belley

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMetamorphic rockHarbourCorundumGroup (periodic table)OceanographyGeochemistrySpinelMineralogyPaleontologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lake Harbour Group (LHG) metacarbonates on Baffin Island contain occurrences of the gemstones sapphire (corundum), spinel (including cobalt-blue), and lapis lazuli (blue haüyne-rich rock). This dissertation uncovers the regional geologic processes (e.g., metamorphic history, metasomatism, protolith geochemistry) that influence gemstone potential by developing genetic models for the LHG gem mineral occurrences. Both barren and gem-bearing metacarbonates were studied using field examination and sampling, petrological (optical) and scanning electron microscope petrography, and whole rock geochemistry. Boron isotope geochemistry, thermodynamic modelling, and age-dating (zircon U-Pb and mica ⁴⁰Ar-³⁹Ar) were employed for selected occurrences. Corundum formation was made possible by three equally important sequential metamorphic reactions: (1) formation of nepheline, diopside, and K-feldspar (inferred) at granulite facies peak metamorphic conditions; (2) partial retrograde replacement of the peak assemblage by phlogopite, oligoclase, calcite, and scapolite; and (3) retrograde break-down of scapolite + nepheline to form albite, muscovite, corundum, and calcite. The corundum-forming reaction only occurs in a <100 °C window. Spinel and haüyne formed at granulite facies peak metamorphic conditions, and spinel remained stable through upper amphibolite facies retrogression. The corundum, spinel, and haüyne occurrences are interpreted to have different sedimentary protoliths with the exception of a few metasomatic spinel occurrences. The protoliths of the occurrences are interpreted to be: [A] impure dolomitic limestone (spinel); [B] dolomitic marl (spinel, corundum); [C] magnesite-rich evaporitic marl (spinel); and [D] evaporite (halite and anhydrite)-bearing dolomite-rich marl (haüyne). The meta-marls have Al/Si abundances comparable to that expected in a siliciclastic mud. Calc-silicate rocks barren of gem minerals have lower Al/Si (sandier protoliths). Spinel-bearing calc-silicates have higher Al/Si relative to that of sapphire- and haüyne-bearing rocks. High abundances of Al to Si are crucial to spinel formation in Mg-rich calc-silicates. Spinel formation in impure dolomitic marbles requires low K activity and does not require high Al/Si. Cobalt enrichment at two spinel occurrences is localized and interpreted to represent geochemical features of the protolith. The genetic models provide broad gemstone exploration criteria for carbonate-bearing metasedimentary sequences such as the LHG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.131
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207