MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965261602 · doi:10.33112/ritid.18.3.9

Er ég vondur femínisti?

2018· article· is· W2965261602 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aðalsteinn Eyþórsson

Bibliographic record

VenueRitið · 2018
Typearticle
Languageis
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtGlobeTheologyPhilosophyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Þýðingin að þessu sinni er grein kanadíska rithöfundarins Margaret Atwood, „Am I a Bad Feminist?“ sem birtist í dagblaðinu The Globe and Mail í Toronto í ársbyrjun 2018. Tilefni þess að Atwood skrifaði greinina eru atburðir sem áttu sér stað í Háskólanum í Bresku-Kólumbíu fyrir nokkrum árum þegar kennari við skólann var leystur frá störfum. Mikil umræða skapaðist um málið og viðbrögð rithöfunda og annarra sem kenna má við kanadíska menningarstofnun leiddu til klofnings í kanadískum bókmenntaheimi. Forsaga og eftirköst greinarinnar eru rakin í inngangi ritstjórnar og Aðalsteins Eyþórssonar, en óhætt er að segja að hún hafi vakið töluverð viðbrögð.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRitiðSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207