MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965342598 · doi:10.1002/ppap.201900044

Time‐resolved analysis of the precursor fragmentation kinetics in an hybrid PVD/PECVD dusty plasma with pulsed injection of HMDSO

2019· article· en· W2965342598 on OpenAlexafffund
Vincent Garofano, Rémi Bérard, X. Glad, C. Joblin, Kremena Makasheva, Luc Stafford

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma Processes and Polymers · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersFP7 Ideas: European Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsHexamethyldisiloxaneDissociation (chemistry)PlasmaPlasma-enhanced chemical vapor depositionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)KineticsElectron temperatureArgonMaterials scienceChemistryThin filmNanotechnologyChromatographyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Plasma sampling mass spectrometry (PSMS) has been carried out to study the fragmentation kinetics of hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) in a low‐pressure, axially asymmetric argon rf discharge designed for the growth of nanocomposite thin films through a hybrid PVD/PECVD method. Experiments have been conducted with a pulsed injection of HMDSO over a 5‐s period. Plasma conditions have been chosen to favor formation and disappearance of dust occurring in cycles of a few hundred seconds. The dissociation degree of HMDSO and the relative intensities of HMDSO‐related fragments are reported and analyzed regarding these two specific time‐scales. PSMS showed that formation of dust increases HMDSO dissociation. The same result can be deduced from the particle balance equation of HMDSO using the electron density and temperature obtained from optical emission spectroscopy as the only input parameters. For HMDSO, electron‐impact dissociation is the dominant loss pathway over diffusion and recombination on the reactor walls. Small C xH y compounds and H 2 are mostly generated from surface recombination mechanisms and lost by electron‐impact dissociation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlasma Processes and PolymersSame topicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207