STUDY KOMPARATIF SISTEM JUAL DAN PROSPEK KEBERLANJUTANNYA AGROINDUSTRI TAPE SINGKONG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ringkasan Agroindustri Tape Singkong yang berada di Desa Wonojoyo Kecamatan Gurah Kabupaten Kediri merupakan industri rumah tangga (home industri). Sebagian warga di Desa Wonojoyo menggantungkan hidup sebagai pengusaha agroindustri tape singkong. Dengan hasil usaha memproduksi tape singkong akan menambah pendapatan rumah tangga mereka. Di Desa Wonojoyo memiliki dua sistem jual yaitu sistem jual ke pengecer dan sistem jual ke konsumen langsung. Oleh karena itu, perlu di lakukan analisis perbandingan mengenai perbedaan pendapatan antara sistem jual ke pengecer dan sistem jual ke konsumen langsung, analisis BEP (titik impas), dan bagaimana prospek keberlanjutan agroindustri tape singkong dari permintaan di pasaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui berapa besarnya perbedaan pendapatan yang diperoleh pada Agroindustri Tape Singkong baik dengan system jual ke pengecer dan sistem jual ke konsumen langsung, untuk mengetahui besarnya Break Event Point (titik impas) Agroindustri Tape Singkong baik dengan sistem jual ke pengecer dan sistem jual ke konsumen langsung, untuk mengetahui bagaimana prospek keberlanjutannya agroindustri tape singkong di Desa Wonojoyo Kecamatan Gurah Kabupaten Kediri.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".