MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2965360667 · doi:10.22215/etd/2014-10564

The Influence of Vegetation and Climate on Wildfires in Jasper, Alberta, Over the Last ~3,500 Years

2014· dissertation· en· W2965360667 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emma L. Davis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharcoalPhysical geographyVegetation (pathology)Climate changeDendrochronologyGeographyContext (archaeology)Fire regimeWatershedPeriod (music)Fire historyPollenClimatologyEnvironmental scienceForestryEcologyArchaeologyEcosystemGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study employed a multi-proxy approach to gain insights into past fire dynamics within the watershed of Little Trefoil Lake in Jasper, Alberta, Canada.Charcoal analysis and dendrochronology were used to characterize the historical fire regime and place past trends within the context of the present day landscape.A ~3,500year record of fire events was established by analyzing macroscopic charcoal remains, and pollen analysis was used to determine changes in the dominant vegetation type.Charcoal and pollen analyses indicated that climate has been the strongest control on the fire regime around Little Trefoil Lake over the last ~3,500 years.The contemporary fire record, as reconstructed using tree-ring data, showed that the watershed has experienced a mixed-severity fire regime.Active fire management strategies adapted to this type of fire regime should be pursued to ensure the resilience of the forest as we continue forward in a period of rapid climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFire effects on ecosystems→French-language works237,207→