Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertension is a widespread but rarely symptomatic chronic condition characterized by raised blood pressure over a lengthy period of time that causes serious vascular damage. South Asians are nearly three times more susceptible to hypertension than European Whites. As compared to South Asian women, men are more prone to hypertension risk factors such as alcohol and tobacco consumption, remain less compliant with antihypertensive medications, and experience more cardiovascular events and mortality. Age is also a known risk factor of hypertension. How South Asian older men managed their hypertension was a knowledge gap. The current grounded theory revealed the four-stage processes of Savvy the Self for hypertension management in South Asian men aged 55 years and older in a Canadian context: (1) self-care, (2) self-protection, (3) making sense, and (4) equipping self. Findings exposed the links between South Asian men’s masculine identity, cultural beliefs, and disequilibrium in their self-care and developmental needs that emerged with a diagnosis of hypertension. The disequilibrium eventually evoked awakening for South Asian men that mobilized the processes of Savvy the Self leading to their hypertension management. This grounded theory provided insights into South Asian culture and revealed new nursing knowledge to assess, plan, and deliver nursing care for older South Asian men with hypertension. Findings may be useful for health education and services, cultural and faith-based community organizational services, and future research related to professionals’ cultural competency for serving a diverse group of people.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".