MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965421111 · doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00186

Impact of Graded Passive Cycling on Hemodynamics, Brain, and Heart Perfusion in Healthy Adults

2019· article· en· W2965421111 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Chen, Claudio M. Martin, Christopher W. McIntyre, Ian Ball, James Duffin, Marat Slessarev

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCadenceHemodynamicsMedicineCardiologyCardiac indexCardiac outputCerebral blood flowCardiac function curveHeart rateAnesthesiaPerfusionIschemiaInternal medicineBlood flowMean arterial pressureBlood pressureStroke volumeHeart failurePhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Passive in-bed cycling (PC) can provide the benefits of early mobilization to critically ill patients who are unable to exercise actively. However, the effect of PC on global hemodynamics and perfusion of ischemia-prone organs, such as the brain and the heart, is unknown. Therefore, prior to studying the effects of PC in hemodynamically fragile critically ill patients, we characterized hemodynamic, brain blood flow and cardiac function responses to a graded increase in PC cadence in a cohort of healthy subjects. Methods: We measured global hemodynamic indices, middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv), and cardiac function in response to a graded increase in PC cadence. Using 5 minute stages, we increased cadence from 5 to 55 RPM in increments of 10 RPM, preceded and followed by 5 minute baseline and recovery periods at 0 RPM. The mean values obtained during the last 2 minutes of each stage were compared within and between subjects for all metrics using repeated measures ANOVA. Results: 11 healthy subjects (6 females) completed the protocol. Between subjects, there was no change in MCAv, cardiac function or hemodynamics with the graded increase in cadence with one exception. There was a 7% increase in mean arterial pressure from baseline to 55RPM, that persisted through the recovery period. Across subjects, responses were heterogeneous, with some experiencing reduction in cardiac index, cerebral blood flow and cardiac function, especially at higher cadence. Conclusions: In healthy adults, increasing PC cadence increased mean arterial pressure in all subjects, while cardiac index, cerebral blood flow and cardiac function responses varied between subjects. Application of PC to critically ill patients must therefore consider individual variation in responses and tailor the PC to the patient. It is essential to further characterize these responses to PC in the critically ill prior to wide-scale clinical implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MedicineSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207