MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ANALISIS YURIDIS PERSAMAAN HAK ANTARA PESERTA PENDIDIKAN DOKTER SPESIALIS DENGAN PEKERJA

2019· article· id· W2965446070 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArena Hukum · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationPolitical sciencePedagogyMedical educationHumanitiesSociologyMedicineLawArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Participants in specialist medical education programs are one aspect that plays an important role in national development in the health sector. This is inseparable from one aspect of the specialist medical education program, which is service. Other countries such as the United States and Canada have realized the importance of participants in this specialist medical education program both as students as well as workers. But in Indonesia, it is only the status of a student. The purpose of this study is to further examine the equality of rights between workers and participants in the doctor's education program. This study is a normative juridical research using the conceptual approach to legislation, and comparative approach. The results indicate that there are similarities in the elements contained in the employment agreement between the workers and participants of the specialist medical education program so that the specialist education program participants should also obtain status as workers other than students. Based on this, then in this study there are several suggestions by the author including the need for revisions in the status of students towards specialist medical education participants. Abstrak Peserta program pendidikan dokter spesialis merupakan salah satu aspek yang berperan penting dalam pembangunan nasional di bidang kesehatan. Hal ini tidak terlepas dari salah satu aspek dalam program pendidikan dokter spesialis yaitu pelayanan. Negara-negara lain seperti Amerika Serikat dan Kanada telah menyadari akan pentingnya peserta program pendidikan dokter spesialis ini sehingga status peserta program pendidikan dokter spesialis di kedua negara tersebut adalah sebagai mahasiswa sekaligus sebagai pekerja. Namun di Indonesia, hanya berstatus sebagai mahasiswa. Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk meneliti lebih jauh persamaan hak-hak antara pekerja dengan peserta program pendidikan dokter. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat persamaan unsur-unsur yang terkandung dalam perjanjian kerja antara pekerja dan peserta program pendidikan dokter spesialis sehingga peserta program pendidikan dokter spesialis seharusnya juga memperoleh status sebagai pekerja selain mahasiswa. Berdasarkan hal ini, maka dalam penelitian ini terdapat beberapa saran oleh penulis diantaranya adalah perlu adanya revisi dalam status mahasiswa terhadap peserta pendidikan dokter spesialis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArena HukumSame topicLegal and Policy Analysis in IndonesiaFrench-language works237,207