MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965509319 · doi:10.4000/insaniyat.18061

Giovanni AGRESTI et Joseph-G TURI, (2016). Représentations sociales des langues et politiques linguistiques. Déterminismes, implications, regards croisés

2017· article· fr· W2965509319 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Boussiga Aissa

Bibliographic record

VenueInsaniyat / إنسانيات · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les articles publiés dans cet ouvrage collectif sont les actes du Premier Congrès Mondiale des Droits Linguistiques qui a eu lieu, du 19 au 23 mai 2015, à Teramo en Italie. Ce congrès est le fruit d’une convergence entre deux traditions scientifiques : les conférences de l’Académie Internationale de Droit Linguistique de Montréal et les Journées des Droits Linguistiques (JDL), animées conjointement par l’Associazione LEM-Italia et l’Université de Teramo.La question de la diversité linguistiq...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInsaniyat / إنسانياتSame topicSecond Language Learning and TeachingFrench-language works237,207