Treatment outcomes in patients older than age 60 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the nonclinical trial setting.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
6572 Background: Optimal treatment of older adults with AML remains challenging. While AML tends to be a disease of older adults, this population experiences greater treatment-related toxicity and worse overall survival than younger patients. Only fit older adults enter clinical trials and thus the results may not apply to the entire population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients > 60 years with AML (APL excluded) diagnosed prior to 2008 with IRB approval. The association of clinical factors (age, sex, comorbidities, prior chemotherapy), leukemia (prior myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasm, cytogenetics, WBC count), and therapy (induction chemotherapy, palliative chemotherapy, and best supportive care) as they relate to overall survival was evaluated using bivariate and multivariate regression analyses. Results: Of 87 patients (median age 73), 45% were male, 58% had high risk cytogenetics, 38% had prior MDS/MPD, 92% were chemotherapy naive, and 21% were in the high/very high Charlson risk class. The majority (67%) received standard dose induction chemotherapy (IC), 9% received (palliative intent) low-dose chemotherapy (LDC), and 24% received best supportive care (BSC). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 2.5 months. On bivariate analysis high WBC (>50,000 at presentation) was negatively associated (1.0 vs 2.7 months p <0.01) with survival. OS for IC, LDC, and BSC were 3.1, 2.8, and 0.7 months, respectively (p=0.001). On multivariable analysis, IC conferred longer survival when compared to LDC and BSC combined (OR 0.33 CI 0.2-0.6, p<0.001). High WBC was associated with a decreased survival time (OR 2.96 CI 1.6-5.5, p=0.02). Mortality during induction or consolidation chemotherapy was 38%. At 5-year follow-up, only 4 patients were alive. Conclusions: In a non-clinical trial setting, OS of older adults with AML remains dismal. While IC offers a chance of longer survival, mortality with IC is unacceptably high. Further studies are required to identify and validate tools for risk stratification in older adults with AML as well as to utilize therapies with an improved toxicity profile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".