MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965685656 · doi:10.1590/0102-4698211143

OS IMPACTOS DO PACTO NACIONAL PELA ALFABETIZAÇÃO NA IDADE CERTA: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA

2019· article· pt· W2965685656 on OpenAlex
ROSA SELETA DE SOUZA FERREIRA XAVIER, Tiago Lisboa Bartholo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducação em Revista · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicHealthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMO: Este artigo apresenta os principais achados de uma revisão sistemática sobre o Pacto Nacional pela Alfabetização na Idade Certa (PNAIC), instituído pela Portaria 867, de 04 de julho de 2012, considerado o maior programa de formação de professores desenvolvido pelo Ministério da Educação. Foi realizada uma tipologia dos trabalhos coletados - total de 121 publicações - e construídas categorias de análise para avaliar a qualidade da evidência produzida nas avaliações de impacto (quatro estudos). Os resultados sugerem que: a) há um grande volume de estudos sobre o PNAIC, porém um número muito pequeno de estudos avaliativos sobre o impacto do Programa; b) boa parte dos estudos que descrevem potenciais efeitos da política são, na realidade, estudos sobre percepção de impacto; c) os estudos de impacto encontrados, além de serem escassos, apresentam baixa validade interna e externa, com limitações importantes, referentes ao desenho, metodologia e escala.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it