Spatial Data Mining and Big Data Analysis of Tourist Travel Behavior
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The user behavior and preference can be recognized by analyzing the spatial, temporal and semantic attributes of geographic data, making it possible to reconstruct the real-world travel trajectories of users. This paper collects and preprocesses the Weibo check-in data at A-level scenic spots in two Chinese provinces, namely, Jiangsu and Zhejiang, and analyzed the tourists' travel behavior from the perspectives of time and space. From the angle of time, the author examined the interannual variations of the check-in data from 2016 to 2018, and explored how the data changed on holidays, weekends and workdays. From the angle of space, the kernel density analysis was performed on the collected data, and the hot spots were determined. Finally, the spatial and location flows and flow directions of holiday travels were investigated, and the travel mode and features on holidays were obtained. The research findings lay the basis for the development of wisdom tourism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it